Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance over the last half-year shows Caijsa Wilda Hennemann slightly ahead with 36.14% points won compared to Amarissa Kiara Toth’s 34.74%.
• In return games, Amarissa Kiara Toth has a slight edge over Caijsa Wilda Hennemann in second serve returns with 52.12% to 51.49%.
• Caijsa Wilda Hennemann holds an advantage in first serve returns, outperforming Amarissa Kiara Toth with 41.73% to 36.86%.
• Could the narrow margin in breakpoint saving rates (44.98% for Amarissa Kiara Toth vs. 45.04% for Caijsa Wilda Hennemann) play a pivotal role?
• Last year's match win rate heavily favors Caijsa Wilda Hennemann, who secured victories in 84.62% of matches compared to Amarissa Kiara Toth's 67.65%.
• Both players shine on clay with a career win percentage of 68%, but Caijsa Wilda Hennemann outperforms on hard courts (64% win rate) relative to Amarissa Kiara Toth (43%).
• Relating to player experience, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has excelled at the Challengers/ITF tournaments, with a 77.78% win rate, compared to Amarissa Kiara Toth's 69.23% in similar events.
• How important is opponent quality in making a prediction? Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has faced slightly more competitive fields with an average opponent rank of 381.9 versus Amarissa's 391.56.
• In crucial deciding-set scenarios, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann holds a notable advantage, winning 75% of these sets compared to Amarissa Kiara Toth's 54%.
• When it comes to breakpoint conversion, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann exhibits a superior 43.62% success rate, providing a strategic edge in crucial moments over Amarissa Kiara Toth's 37.20%.

Editorial Prediction (November 21, 2025, UTC):

Assessing the recent performance data, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann appears to have several advantages that could greatly influence the outcome of this match. Her slight edge in both second serve performance and first serve returns suggests a potential to establish dominance during critical moments.

The marginally stronger ability to save breakpoints might not be decisive by itself, but when combined with her superior rate of converting breakpoint opportunities, it builds a picture of a player who can capitalize on her opponent's weaknesses.

Amarissa Kiara Toth shows strength in returning second serves, potentially turning this game into a closer contest. However, her considerably lower match win rate over the past year and less competitive experience on hard surfaces may hold her back.

Ultimately, considering both players' current trajectories and past performances, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann seems to be the favorite to clinch this matchup with her higher overall match win rate, impressive performance in deciding sets, and superior handling of high-pressure scenarios.

Based on these facts, Caijsa Wilda Hennemann is likely to emerge as the winner of the upcoming match.